I definitely feel better reading this...
Why Chief Justice Roberts Made the Right Long-Term Decision With ObamaCare
Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.
It will be a short-lived celebration.
Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.
Click below to continue...
Read more of the column at IJ Review...
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Friday, June 29, 2012
Is There Ever Enough Money for Schools?
Nope. Never.
Nada.
Perdue has announced she will veto the state budget. According to a WRAL article:
"Perdue said, however, that the budget doesn't include enough money for schools, and Republican legislative leaders have repeatedly rebuffed her efforts to negotiate a compromise."
There's never enough money. They got the lottery funds. Thanks to Dumpling, she raided them. They get funds from courts, etc, on top of local funding, state funding, and federal funding. We have More at Four, Head Start, Pre-K, Title 1, yada yada yada.
And on the local front, I swear they keep nit picking the BOC for this paving project or that paving project. This petty need and that petty need. And then our Board of Education hires a lawyer, highly respected Raleigh law firm (can't Jimmy Love handle it??) - anyway they spend YOUR tax dollars to sue about a virtual charter school. Reason? So afraid funds will be diverted to something that works!
When our weebly educators realize that our schools cannot be a ONE STOP shop and when the KIDS matter more than grabbing our tax dollars, you'll see positive changes in the education system. Until then, send Moss and company a head of cheese to go with that whine.
On top of all of this, Perdue is vetoing a budget that gives state employees a raise! She's been yelling about raises for quite some time. So what gives, Missy? You either want state employees to have more cash or you don't!
And to boot she's salivating over "over collections".
“I am committed to ensuring that a portion of this revenue source, along with other funds, be dedicated to schools, jobs, probation and parole officers and other urgent needs," Perdue said. "I just spoke to Speaker Tillis and President Pro Tem Berger and asked them to work with me in a bi-partisan way to reach an agreement that will allow an amended budget to become law by July 1.”
What? Why can't anything over what is needed be sent back to you and me? Over collected = over taxed. It's our money anyway. Couldn't you use an extra dime or two?
Our lame duck Governor thinks she really is something else - kinda believes she can command a few things. Wonder how Walter will spin away the veto of increasing state employees' pay? Does he agree? Oh my. Let the ads begin.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Told Ya so...
Insurance industry warns of higher rates, as ObamaCare supporters see long-term fix
President Obama says the health care law makes coverage more affordable, but the insurance industry reacted to the Supreme Court decision by saying that the ruling will actually end up raising rates even more than they have climbed since the law was enacted.
America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s lobby group, issued a statement supporting expanding health care coverage to millions of Americans, but it said, “major provisions, such as the premium tax, will have unintended consequences of raising costs and disrupting coverage unless they are addressed.”
The group's CEO, Karen Ignagni, told Fox News that because of the increased costs, “It's time for people to roll up their sleeves and look very carefully at those provisions.”
The Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research group, has said that the average family insurance premium in 2011 topped $15,000 -- a 9 percent increase from the year before, while premiums had climbed just 3 percent a year before the law went into effect.
AETNA, the nation's fourth largest insurer, says its polices increased from 1 to 2 percent.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/28/health-care-law-and-insurance-rates/#ixzz1z920zInJ
President Obama says the health care law makes coverage more affordable, but the insurance industry reacted to the Supreme Court decision by saying that the ruling will actually end up raising rates even more than they have climbed since the law was enacted.
America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s lobby group, issued a statement supporting expanding health care coverage to millions of Americans, but it said, “major provisions, such as the premium tax, will have unintended consequences of raising costs and disrupting coverage unless they are addressed.”
The group's CEO, Karen Ignagni, told Fox News that because of the increased costs, “It's time for people to roll up their sleeves and look very carefully at those provisions.”
The Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research group, has said that the average family insurance premium in 2011 topped $15,000 -- a 9 percent increase from the year before, while premiums had climbed just 3 percent a year before the law went into effect.
AETNA, the nation's fourth largest insurer, says its polices increased from 1 to 2 percent.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/28/health-care-law-and-insurance-rates/#ixzz1z920zInJ
Holder in Contempt!
BREAKING: The House Votes to Hold Attorney General Holder in Contempt of Congress
Kyle June 28, 2012 2:14 pm
The House of Representatives voted to place Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over hundreds of documents related to the Operation Fast & Furious scandal.
A total of 239 Republicans voted in favor of the resolution with 17 Democrats joining them. The final tally was 255 in favor and 67 against. Two Republicans voted nay and one Democrat voted present. More than one hundred Democrats walked off the floor in protest.
The contempt vote is a historic setback for an administration that claimed it would bring “transparency” to the White House. Instead, Attorney General Holder refused to release documents that would potentially implicate himself and the president in wrongdoing.
Operation Fast and Furious is plausibly the most serious scandal in American political history. On the Obama administration’s watch, thousands of guns were run to Mexican drug cartels and only several hundred guns were traced. The operation resulted in hundreds of Mexican civilian deaths and that of border patrol agent Brian Terry.
While several Democrats grandstanded and decried the contempt vote as election year politics, the vote was an attempt to get accountability from a White House that has stonewalled and refused to come clean with the American people. The Congressional Black Caucus even suggested the resolution against Eric Holder was racially motivated and publicized that they would walk out of the vote.
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9380-the-house-votes-to-hold-attorney-general-holder-in-contempt-of-congress/
Kyle June 28, 2012 2:14 pm
The House of Representatives voted to place Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over hundreds of documents related to the Operation Fast & Furious scandal.
A total of 239 Republicans voted in favor of the resolution with 17 Democrats joining them. The final tally was 255 in favor and 67 against. Two Republicans voted nay and one Democrat voted present. More than one hundred Democrats walked off the floor in protest.
The contempt vote is a historic setback for an administration that claimed it would bring “transparency” to the White House. Instead, Attorney General Holder refused to release documents that would potentially implicate himself and the president in wrongdoing.
Operation Fast and Furious is plausibly the most serious scandal in American political history. On the Obama administration’s watch, thousands of guns were run to Mexican drug cartels and only several hundred guns were traced. The operation resulted in hundreds of Mexican civilian deaths and that of border patrol agent Brian Terry.
While several Democrats grandstanded and decried the contempt vote as election year politics, the vote was an attempt to get accountability from a White House that has stonewalled and refused to come clean with the American people. The Congressional Black Caucus even suggested the resolution against Eric Holder was racially motivated and publicized that they would walk out of the vote.
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9380-the-house-votes-to-hold-attorney-general-holder-in-contempt-of-congress/
ObamaCare Survives..America Dies!
Supreme Court upholds individual mandate,
ObamaCare survives
This is a sad day for America. Obamacare is slap in the face to the Constitution. It is NOT what the Founding Fathers wanted. It shouldn't be what anyone wants.
I hope this puts the stake in Obama's election. Matter of fact, I bet it does.
America - elections have consequences. All you liberals who are happy...well when the death panel tells you you're not worth saving, cry by yourself. You get what you deserve.
Summer jobs? Forget it.
College students? Your job chances just got killed.
Small businesses? Your prosperity just got killed (any business with 50 or more employees must provide healthcare for part-timers.)
Oh now the IRS owns your bank account.
Oh Stock market has just spiraled down.
Stocks Slump After Health Ruling; Banks Drag (http://www.cnbc.com/id/47994090)
This Election Just Became About Obamacare
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/election-just-became-about-obamacare_647928.html
While Waiting on SCOTUS...
to rule on ObamaCare, let's take a look at the 2700+ "We have to pass it to see what's in it" monstrosity called "Affordable Care Act".
Most of us know this isn't what the Founding Fathers had in mind for government's responsibility. Over the years we, the silent majority, have gotten up everyday, gone to work, fed our families, found healthcare on our own, looked after our neighbors and kids, etc, etc, etc. We didn't need government.
Anyone who has studied Economics, knows what happens to prices of goods and services when there is limited competition and limited supply. Prices naturally go up. Prices ARE going to increase under ObamaCare. You simply can't add everybody in America to this thing and think we will all be taken care of. It's not free. So who is going to pay? Why have Obamacare if all of us are healthy? Honestly, I thought it was being implemented because of the sick. Who is going to pay for government healthcare? We have almost 50% of Americans who don't even pay taxes now. So that leaves the other 50% to pay. Which side are you on? Why do I even bring up taxes? How else are they going to force you to pay? They will tax you. They say it isn't a tax, though. ?????
I am an American. Under Obamacare, because I am an American, I have to be in Obamacare. And some beaurocrat will tell me if I am worthy of living or dying. That is in direct opposition of the Constitution. And the liberty and freedom we have been blessed with for HUNDREDS of years. So because I breathe air in the USA, it is now a requirement by Congress that I purchase a good or service? No. I don't think so.
And the IRS is going to make it hell for us. They are going to take our homes, cars, bank accounts, etc, if we don't participate. Or worse, we will be sent to jail. Even Nancy has said that. According to reports, the Obama Admin has already sent $500 million to the IRS. Wait that's half of what they, Pelosi, Reid, and cronies, told us ObamaCare was going to cost anyway. Please don't be so stupid as to believe this is going to work.
If you don't believe me, read the bill. Here's a link:
Most of us know this isn't what the Founding Fathers had in mind for government's responsibility. Over the years we, the silent majority, have gotten up everyday, gone to work, fed our families, found healthcare on our own, looked after our neighbors and kids, etc, etc, etc. We didn't need government.
Anyone who has studied Economics, knows what happens to prices of goods and services when there is limited competition and limited supply. Prices naturally go up. Prices ARE going to increase under ObamaCare. You simply can't add everybody in America to this thing and think we will all be taken care of. It's not free. So who is going to pay? Why have Obamacare if all of us are healthy? Honestly, I thought it was being implemented because of the sick. Who is going to pay for government healthcare? We have almost 50% of Americans who don't even pay taxes now. So that leaves the other 50% to pay. Which side are you on? Why do I even bring up taxes? How else are they going to force you to pay? They will tax you. They say it isn't a tax, though. ?????
I am an American. Under Obamacare, because I am an American, I have to be in Obamacare. And some beaurocrat will tell me if I am worthy of living or dying. That is in direct opposition of the Constitution. And the liberty and freedom we have been blessed with for HUNDREDS of years. So because I breathe air in the USA, it is now a requirement by Congress that I purchase a good or service? No. I don't think so.
And the IRS is going to make it hell for us. They are going to take our homes, cars, bank accounts, etc, if we don't participate. Or worse, we will be sent to jail. Even Nancy has said that. According to reports, the Obama Admin has already sent $500 million to the IRS. Wait that's half of what they, Pelosi, Reid, and cronies, told us ObamaCare was going to cost anyway. Please don't be so stupid as to believe this is going to work.
If you don't believe me, read the bill. Here's a link:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3200ih/pdf/BILLS-111hr3200ih.pdf
And here are some specific details that my husband wrote and paid for publication in the Sanford Herald in 2010. Click on the image:
And here are some specific details that my husband wrote and paid for publication in the Sanford Herald in 2010. Click on the image:
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Don't be a scaredy cat like the Dems!
Don’t be like the DNC and run away from
“ your guy”…No Need to Fear these Men!
They mean what they say and say what they mean!
Here’s your opportunity to help get these fine Conservative gentlemen elected to the Lee County Board of Commissioners. They believe in God, family, country, smaller, more efficient government, as well as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all, regardless of party affiliation.
Contact FRESH BREW Editor for more info.
Trouble is Really Brewing!
House Dems' campaign chief urges candidates to steer clear of convention
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-dems-campaign-chief-urges-candidates-to-steer-clear-convention/?test=latestnews#ixzz1z1Pca0Vv
- Shown here is Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y. (AP)
The top Democrat in charge of getting other Democrats elected to the House is urging his party's candidates to steer clear of the national convention later this year.
The piece of advice from Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, came during the Reuters Washington Summit Tuesday.
"If they want to win an election, they need to be in their districts," Israel said of Democratic congressional candidates, according to Reuters
.
The comment follows decisions by several vulnerable Democrats to skip this year's national convention -- to be held in early September in Charlotte, N.C.
"A trip to Charlotte may be interesting, but why leave your districts?" Israel reportedly said. He claimed President Obama's approval ratings had little to do with the guidance -- Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., former head of the DCCC, offered similar advice to candidates in 2008.
But Democrats have been ruling out attendance this year at a rather steady clip.
The piece of advice from Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, came during the Reuters Washington Summit Tuesday.
"If they want to win an election, they need to be in their districts," Israel said of Democratic congressional candidates, according to Reuters
The comment follows decisions by several vulnerable Democrats to skip this year's national convention -- to be held in early September in Charlotte, N.C.
"A trip to Charlotte may be interesting, but why leave your districts?" Israel reportedly said. He claimed President Obama's approval ratings had little to do with the guidance -- Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., former head of the DCCC, offered similar advice to candidates in 2008.
But Democrats have been ruling out attendance this year at a rather steady clip.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-dems-campaign-chief-urges-candidates-to-steer-clear-convention/?test=latestnews#ixzz1z1Pca0Vv
Dems Break Rank...Holder Contempt Vote On!
House Democrats break rank to back Holder contempt as vote looms
At least three Democrats have joined the ranks of Republicans planning to vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over his refusal to turn over Operation Fast and Furious documents.
The Democrats who have taken that stance so far are all conservative-leaning lawmakers facing perilous political circumstances in their home districts. Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who is leading the charge on contempt, predicted to Fox News that up to 31 Democrats could be considering voting against Holder -- in reference to a letter signed by 31 Democrats last year expressing concern about Fast and Furious.
The latest Democrats to announce an anti-Holder stance are Reps. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., and John Barrow, D-Ga.
"While Republicans and Democrats argue over the scope of the people's right to know what happened, the Attorney General has decided to withhold relevant documents," Barrow said in a statement. "The only way to get to the bottom of what happened is for the Department of Justice to turn over the remaining documents, so that we can work together to ensure this tragedy never happens again."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-democrat-breaks-ranks-to-back-holder-contempt-as-vote-looms/#ixzz1z0gu6SHj
At least three Democrats have joined the ranks of Republicans planning to vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over his refusal to turn over Operation Fast and Furious documents.
The Democrats who have taken that stance so far are all conservative-leaning lawmakers facing perilous political circumstances in their home districts. Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who is leading the charge on contempt, predicted to Fox News that up to 31 Democrats could be considering voting against Holder -- in reference to a letter signed by 31 Democrats last year expressing concern about Fast and Furious.
The latest Democrats to announce an anti-Holder stance are Reps. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., and John Barrow, D-Ga.
"While Republicans and Democrats argue over the scope of the people's right to know what happened, the Attorney General has decided to withhold relevant documents," Barrow said in a statement. "The only way to get to the bottom of what happened is for the Department of Justice to turn over the remaining documents, so that we can work together to ensure this tragedy never happens again."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/27/house-democrat-breaks-ranks-to-back-holder-contempt-as-vote-looms/#ixzz1z0gu6SHj
Another Sad Day In America
Lying in bed this morning I heard Rush Radio talking about reelection of Charlie Rangel. My mouth flew open and of course my response was: "You have got to be kidding". I always ask the same question, how could this be. But then I realized that he won the election again because of the sad, no educated people who follow this man. Apparantly he promised them the world: food stamps, free 250 minute cell phones if they vote for him. Oh to be controlled by material things and I would not hesitate to say food stamps and 250 minute free cell phones does not rock my world like it does for the pitiful human beings voting for this crook.
As I told my husband, you think they were bused in during Obama's election, you ain't seen nothing yet. Trailways will be over heated for busing the blacks to vote in this upcoming election. I thank the Lord he gave me brains to think for myself and not let a human being rule my life. Should I feel sorry for the citizens of the US who keep letting someone lead them by a string, not at all. We all have the choice to make the right decision. That comes from being educated on events in the world and not relying on someone else to do it for us. So those of you who love wollering in poverty, wollering with the dogs, getting those food stamps (selling them on the side), getting that free cell phone, go right ahead. I choose to make my own decisions and not vote crooks back into office.
Linda
As I told my husband, you think they were bused in during Obama's election, you ain't seen nothing yet. Trailways will be over heated for busing the blacks to vote in this upcoming election. I thank the Lord he gave me brains to think for myself and not let a human being rule my life. Should I feel sorry for the citizens of the US who keep letting someone lead them by a string, not at all. We all have the choice to make the right decision. That comes from being educated on events in the world and not relying on someone else to do it for us. So those of you who love wollering in poverty, wollering with the dogs, getting those food stamps (selling them on the side), getting that free cell phone, go right ahead. I choose to make my own decisions and not vote crooks back into office.
Linda
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Dear Chet ...A LEED BRAT from the PAC
If you've followed this blog, you know I have bones to pick with the elitists in this county. The LEED BRAT PAC (aka Donor list to the right - another one coming soon) deliberately put out vitriol disgusting ads in the Sanford Herald during the primary. Now, I have to come to the conclusion that the Herald must have made lots of dough. They sure are trying to discredit a few of us on the right. Hope they all sleep well!
Anyway, LEED is back with more dough and more disgusting attempts to keep Lee County in the hands of good old boys. In the hands of those that will buy elections. I sometimes think they've bought two people on the Board of Elections. I guess that gave them a little backbone. Well below is a letter to Chet Mann from me. A blogger not afraid to take any of them to task. And below that you'll find his recent email. Have fun. Enjoy knowing that the LEED BRAT PAC wants unemployment to remain high, your taxes to remain high, your suffering to stay, empty store fronts, and your kids to go to public schools while ....well just read.
Dear Chet,
Mind if I call you Chet? After all you call me a right wing. I'll at least attempt to be nice. It's hard when evil is present.
Your letter was so encouraging. Encouraging to the right because we have a full glimpse into your twisted view of how things are going so well in Lee County. In essence, let's leave Lee County with high unemployment, empty store fronts and a school system that rewards high paid insurance agents (who happen to be a part of your group) instead of giving our teachers the best options. I suppose your letter is bragging on Tamara Brogan? Well Ms. Brogan has been told her feet would be put to the fire. If she doesn't do as she campaigned, people will know. That means she won't be eating out of your hands if she is honorable and does what she says. Time will tell!
Say it Ain't So: Dems Out of Cash?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqPivQMUIYvmPDWYHKh_WMIQ3CwvOd9jvt8b6pyUJrNr3n3rbMXzNwuFnjidBXZZuainG4GFpEXMjQ-dzB3SIiqh7ufEOO1BQfDlXKWaZ80RZwJ4MfIut7r81_O9hvyIT2kTmSlx4Iu0gc/s1600/untitled.bmp)
Maybe they should look at their platform, leaders and candidates as the reason. The party of inclusion thinks peons like you and me are worthless.
Democrats Cancel Speedway Event at Charlotte Convention
By Hans Nichols - Jun 26, 2012 8:47 AM ET
“While we regret having to move CarolinaFest away from our great partners at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and the City of Concord, we are thrilled with the opportunity that comes with hosting this event in Uptown Charlotte,” said Dan Murrey, the executive director of the Charlotte in 2012 Convention Host Committee.
The move comes as party planners are grappling with a fundraising deficit of roughly $27 million, according to two people familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to discuss internal party politics. With a party ban on direct contributions from corporations, the host committee has raised less than $10 million, well short of its $36.6 million goal, said one of the people.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-26/democrats-may-drop-speedway-event-at-charlotte-convention.html
When California Democrats Reject You...
Ya might be in a bit of trouble....
From one of the bloggers to RightOnline...
You can bet your bottom dollar you won’t hear much about this from the bigs in the shill media, but that doesn’t make it any less newsworthy. For those who haven’t heard, some 13,000 Sacramento Democrats gave Obama the bird in the California Democrat primary.
Read more and see good articles at:
http://campaigntrailreport.com/2012/06/23/democrat-president-rebuked-through-ballot-box-by-13000-sacramento-democrats
From one of the bloggers to RightOnline...
Democrat President Rebuked Through Ballot Box by 13,000 Sacramento Democrats
On June 23, 2012, in Barack Obama, Democrat Party, by Eric Odom
President Barack Obama was the only choice on the ballot for the 85,000 Sacramento County Democrats and 5,000 decline-to-state voters who took Democratic ballots during last Tuesday’s primary. But about 8,000 of those voters left their presidential ballots blank, and another 5,300 scribbled in a write-in candidate.Let’s review. Barack Obama was the only candidate on the ballot. With only one option provided, some 8,000 voters just left that line blank. Another 5,300 wrote in a name other than Barack Obama.
The Democrats who shunned Obama were largely concentrated in conservative parts of the county, particularly Orangevale, Citrus Heights and the rural outskirts.
Read more and see good articles at:
http://campaigntrailreport.com/2012/06/23/democrat-president-rebuked-through-ballot-box-by-13000-sacramento-democrats
Hypocrisy Example #10,799 and Counting..
NO ID NEEDED...UNLESS
You're going to President Obama's fundraising events.
How many times have we witnessed the pure double standard, disgusting hypocrisy from the left? They whine voters will be disenfranchised if IDs are required. But are not those same voters disenfranchised if they can't see their President? YOU DECIDE!
Obama Campaign Requires ID to Enter Campaign Event
On June 23, 2012, in Barack Obama, by Eric Odom
While reading this story be sure to keep in mind that Homeland Security and the Department of Justice are currently locked in a legal battle to stop the state of Florida from ensuring those who vote can legally vote. Also keep in mind that Eric Holder’s Department of Justice will aggressively file lawsuits against any state who works towards asking for proof of identity before being able to cast a vote.
With all of this in mind, why is the Obama campaign requiring identification for entry into official campaign events?
With all of this in mind, why is the Obama campaign requiring identification for entry into official campaign events?
President Barack Obama’s presidential campaign checked the identification of the supporters attending Obama’s “framing” event at Cuyahoga Community College today.
The 1,500 supporters in attendance picked up tickets at campaign offices in Northeast Ohio beginning on Monday, though tickets to the event made no mention of an ID requirement.
Jessica Kershaw, the Obama campaign’s Ohio Press Secretary, confirmed in a statement to BuzzFeed that the campaign checked every supporter’s identification at the door.
“We checked every ID at the door to make sure it matched with the name on the ticket that supporters filled out,” she said. “We did this for every person who came in.”
Continuing School Scandal...Victim Becomes Perpetrator
Can we ever fire a teacher again? This loud mouthed Obama lover should have been gone! Instead she's become the hero. Her family and friends are now harassing the kid that outed her left wing biased views.
This is something we would expect out of Lee County School System since they can't keep themselves out of the news. Enough is enough! Call the Rowan School System and tell them what you think!
Rowan County Board of Education
121 East Second Street
Morehead, KY 40351
Marvin Moore, Superintendent
606-784-8928
121 East Second Street
Morehead, KY 40351
Marvin Moore, Superintendent
606-784-8928
Remember one month ago, (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/20/NC-teacher-screams-student-Obama) when a high-school junior in the Rowan-Salisbury school district in North Carolina videotaped his teacher yelling at another student that he was being disrespectful for criticizing Barack Obama and that his behavior was a criminal offense?
The young man who did the videotaping had a hellish time finishing the school year. In an interview with Breitbart News, the young man’s sister described the ensuing weeks after the videotape. She said that some of the other students have said they are out to get the young man; the teacher, Tanya Dixon-Neely, has relatives who are students in the school. The young man’s family, fearing for his safety, requested for the young man to finish the last three weeks of school at home, but the school refused. Instead, the school offered for the young man to come to school after the other students were already in class, be secluded from other students during the school day and leave before school ended.
According to the videotaper’s sister, not only did the school authorities reject the appeal for home-schooling, they gave him a suspension on his school record for videotaping in the classroom -- the first suspension ever issued for such an action, despite the fact that other students have also videotaped on school grounds.
The young man’s sister stated that assistant principal Antoine Brisbon said to her brother, “That was a very stupid thing you did. You have damaged the school. Our staff is taking a beating because our phones are nonstop. This is all over the country.” She also said that after the video was released, Tanya Dixon-Neely started making indirect remarks at the young man accusing him of stabbing her in the back.
Monday, June 25, 2012
POTUS Less Arizona...
Just in, Homeland Security says "Screw You" to Arizona. We don't care if your citizens die. It's about us and our voters. I mean come on people. Do you believe this stuff? This Administration is far beyond corrupt. They hate us. They hate law abiding people. They hate that fact that Arizona is trying to protect their citizens. They want power and will stop at absolutely nothing to get it.
I can't wait for November. Time for a revolt. Time for a revolt locally, statewide and nationally. I don't know about you but when PBO took the oath it didn't say "United States Less Arizona". But you wouldn't know it.
Homeland Security suspends immigration agreements with Ariz. police
The Obama administration said Monday it is suspending existing agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws, and said it has issued a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants that the Homeland Security Department may get from Arizona police.
Administration officials, speaking on condition they not be named, told reporters they expect to see an increase in the number of calls they get from Arizona police — but that won’t change President Obama’s decision to limit who the government actually tries to detain and deport.
“We will not be issuing detainers on individuals unless they clearly meet our defined priorities,” one official said in a telephone briefing.
The official said despite the increased number of calls, which presumably means more illegal immigrants being reported, the Homeland Security Department government is unlikely to detain a significantly higher number of people, and won’t be boosting personnel to handle the new calls.
“We do not plan on putting additional staff on the ground in Arizona,” the official said.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Arizona may not impose its own penalties for immigration violations, but said state and local police to check the legal status of those they have reasonable suspicion are in the country illegally.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/25/homeland-security-suspends-immigration-agreements-/
Administration officials, speaking on condition they not be named, told reporters they expect to see an increase in the number of calls they get from Arizona police — but that won’t change President Obama’s decision to limit who the government actually tries to detain and deport.
“We will not be issuing detainers on individuals unless they clearly meet our defined priorities,” one official said in a telephone briefing.
The official said despite the increased number of calls, which presumably means more illegal immigrants being reported, the Homeland Security Department government is unlikely to detain a significantly higher number of people, and won’t be boosting personnel to handle the new calls.
“We do not plan on putting additional staff on the ground in Arizona,” the official said.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Arizona may not impose its own penalties for immigration violations, but said state and local police to check the legal status of those they have reasonable suspicion are in the country illegally.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/25/homeland-security-suspends-immigration-agreements-/
Breaking: SCOTUS Rules - Arizona Immigration Law
Supreme Court strikes down most of Arizona immigration law, upholds key provision
Published June 25, 2012
The Supreme Court has struck down most of the controversial Arizona immigration law, but upheld a key provision.
The provision that was upheld requires state and local police officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect could be in the country illegally.
Other provisions, though, were struck down.
The federal government claimed the law encroached on its authority to enforce immigration law.
The provision that was upheld requires state and local police officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect could be in the country illegally.
Other provisions, though, were struck down.
The federal government claimed the law encroached on its authority to enforce immigration law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)